🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to approve a law increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," stated a leading MEP behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, interest grew behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing disturbing social media material suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is primarily unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra use requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to follow this example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve user protection.

Even as this global debate unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers show that states globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.